Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 17th August 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Romanov adopts Jim McLean approach to chase success



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 March 2008
VLADIMIR Romanov and Jim McLean may seem like entirely different characters but they share a theory on football players and wages, even if the Lithuanian tycoon has arrived at such a stance via a costly process.
The confirmation on Friday that Hearts' debt had reached £36m was hardly ground-breaking. That Romanov chose to be in town as the figures were revealed was more surprising for sceptics who fear he has lost interest in his Tynecastle project.

Not
so, say those close to Hearts' owner, with what will follow set to illustrate their view. Players will no longer be "rewarded for failure", according to Charlie Mann, Romanov's spokesman. Cue cheers from fans, who have grown disillusioned with under-performing high-earners.

Friday's figures showed Hearts' annual wage bill to be £12.49m (£10m in 2006) – a huge figure given there was no European football at the end of it. Such figures will not be completely out of reach to any new manager, but basic wages will drop in line with a policy pioneered by McLean two decades ago.

"The new manager does not have to use all of that money, but it emphasises why the appointment must be right," adds Mann. Gone, moreover, are the days when high basic salaries are bestowed on players who offer little in return – Juho Makela, Neil McCann and Mirsad Beslija spring to mind. Bonuses and incentives, however, will remain lucrative in a trimmed playing squad. Given the figures on offer – Hearts finished third in the Premier League twice in a row under Craig Levein, who spent less than £5m a year on wages – Romanov will still expect a team that challenges near the top of the table.

Clearly, aspects of Hearts' business are at best unorthodox and at worst unsustainable. Wages at 125% of turnover blows to pieces every model which football analysts will recommend, but such expense and risk highlights the need for Romanov and his Ukio Bankas Investment Group (UBIG) to put in place a "succession plan". Such a scheme, which would safeguard Hearts' future in the event of Romanov falling ill, for example, remains on the UBIG agenda; those within the corridors of power at Tynecastle must insist it is put into writing so the club can fall back on their parent company's published assets of ?537m (£435m) if needed.

More immediately, a share issue will be launched and underwritten by UBIG to clear much of Hearts' debt. The effects of such a process, successfully incorporated by David Murray at Rangers in the past, would be two-fold. UBIG, in one move, would demonstrate a long-term commitment to Hearts and would also provide a barrier to anyone who wanted to buy them out by insisting any monies from the scheme had to be returned. Potential suitors could have to pay UBIG more than £20m to gain control of Hearts.

Pedro Lopez, now in charge of the Tynecastle redevelopment plans, has a part to play in curtailing Hearts' debts by retrieving the third-party investment which would minimise the club's outlay on the £51m project. A telecoms firm has been linked with sponsoring the new main stand; another option would be that UBIG buy the site from Hearts, a swift property transaction which would put a dent in borrowings but one which Romanov sources have distanced themselves from.

More realistically, converted shares may be in the name of a new UBIG company which has the sole responsibility of developing Tynecastle rather than monies being extracted from Hearts' bank account.

With turnover increasing by the year, Romanov has proved that Hearts can become a profitable outfit, and such monies can only rise with the incorporation of new facilities.

Mann has insisted Romanov plans to visit Edinburgh more regularly in the closing weeks of this season, although the owner has no obligation to attend Hearts' AGM on April 18, although his son, the rarely-spotted Roman, should however be in the chair.

Hearts' debts were almost £22m when Romanov arrived with the club on the brink of oblivion in 2005. Following the sale of Craig Gordon and imminent departure of Roman Bednar, that figure may only have increased by £5m in real terms by this summer.

In between, there has been a Scottish Cup success and plans are afoot to stay at Tynecastle long-term – looking at what might have been, perhaps fans don't much cause for discontent, but they are entitled to more for their money.





The full article contains 752 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 March 2008 8:30 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Heart of Midlothian FC
 
1

Sadiq,

Edinburgh 30/03/2008 02:44:32
Pinilla - Out!
2

GeorgeCowieOrWalterKidd?,

30/03/2008 06:35:45
"More immediately, a share issue will be launched and underwritten by UBIG to clear much of Hearts' debt."

This is potentially huge.
3

Ross,

Athens 30/03/2008 08:29:40
Gone are the days that i would get upset about Romonov.
I don't care anymore.
It's the dafty's who keep going and paying there money i feel sorry for.
When Romonov is gone i will take an interest again.
4

what a chancer,

in the rough 30/03/2008 09:59:02
hearts debt has been with the stands built already and also paying big wages to keep players we could not afford,spending more than we earned,i always thought you pay something back every year not increase,this is a big overdraft,no wonder the scottish banks gave up.
5

,

30/03/2008 10:29:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

,

30/03/2008 10:29:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Away down in Gorgie,

30/03/2008 10:33:54
Great article again by Ewan Murray

Ewan - any luck with that blonde thing in the Station last night?
8

scorchio,

West of the Pecos 30/03/2008 10:41:28
Can we have some "news" please.
This stuff is guff.
9

flecktimus,

Notts 30/03/2008 10:45:11
#6 why was this gravy train ever allowed to exist in the first place?
Because everyone has made money out of HMFC.
Players : Salarys
Kaunas : Transfers Fees (We are still waiting to find out about the 4 Million pounds worth of transfers
Ubig : Interest payments

Unfortunately HMFC has been run as a cash cow
10

,

30/03/2008 10:52:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

30/03/2008 11:01:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

30/03/2008 11:13:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Aitchie,

Craig Gordon Stand 30/03/2008 11:14:46
It seems as though there may be good news. Charlie Mann, Le Puppet, does say on BBC radio that the amount of 12 million on wages is fine - so clearning the decks just now, is not necessarily to bring wages down - but to let better players arrive? And if the debt is converted into shares, then yee ha - no more interest payments.......suddenly life could be getting better - as long as we get a manger and some decent players.
14

,

30/03/2008 11:21:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Aitchie,

Craig Gordon Stand 30/03/2008 11:43:38
I still think that Romanov believes in his rotation policy - but at least he's seen that the players can't be rotated for duds.

I have, for the first time in a long time, a bit of confidence that we have hit the bottom and are on our way back up. Even if that means we don't make the top six.
16

Aitchie,

Craig Gordon Stand 30/03/2008 11:44:52
With turnover increasing by the year, Romanov has proved that Hearts can become a profitable outfit,

Em, not to be too picky, but costs have increased as well - so we aren't profitable.
17

,

30/03/2008 11:50:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

,

30/03/2008 11:54:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

busbyfh,

30/03/2008 12:19:42
Never could understand why players contracts changed all those years ago - It was NOT just Jim Mclean but nearly ALL clubs that offered average wages but good bonuses on wins (reasonable on draws)
It basically meant - Try as you should do - success brings you loads of dosh. Don't try 100% and you lose out.Saves prima donnas strolling about with a contract that says "you don't need to put in effort - you already have the money".

Vlad personally signed Basso last year as Craig Gordon's replacement. Vlad appeared yesterday and Banks was injured , giving Basso his first start for a while.
Even if it was a real "injury" it is a sad state of affairs when every move Hearts make is seen through "conspiracy glasses".
Oh - by the way , this has ocurred twice before to SB at strategic times.
Too much of a coincidence , but mind you - the save Basso had in the first half (ref gave a goal kick) was out of the top drawer - and I am far from the Frenchman's biggest fan.
Dare I say it but yesterday Miko played well - AAAGGGHHH the men in white coats are approaching.

No manager - No season ticket.
20

Bleeding Heart...,

30/03/2008 13:11:13
The tone here seems to be that HMFC has been the victim of greedy players/agents; that the club has acted in good faith and been let down by these individuals.

In some cases, perhaps this is true. But rogue individuals exist and football clubs have to live with this fact and learn how to manage each situation accordingly.

In my view, the policy of signing quality players and paying them attractive salaries is the way to challenge the OF.

I believe that having top players under a top manager at Hearts would be a successful policy. Of course, we did have that in place at the start of season 2005-06, but Romanov decided to sabotage that.

This model wasn't therefore fully tested, but if Burley had remained and had gone on to win the title, and who knows what else, the monies generated would surely have helped fund the wage bill and perhaps more besides.

It's been obvious this season that Romanov has neither the money nor the inclination to challenge the OF, but this news confirms it. Let's be clear: there will be no "big" signings and instead of challenging the OF, we are expected to put up with more mediocrity.

And if Romanov is so keen on cost-cutting, perhaps he could set an example by ending the sinecure enjoyed by "the rarely-spotted Roman"?
21

Tam Flogel,

30/03/2008 13:45:30
If you read the statement on the website it says that the directors haven't taken any remuneration from the company this financial year. Daddy needs his eyes and ears to be around for him in the background but daddy don't trust him enough to let him do anything
22

Santa,

greenland 31/03/2008 09:26:05
Who is this Apology for a reporter Ewan Murray? Why does he not just let Charlie Mann write the article.
A couple of points to raise with Mann next time he calls.
1)The £36 million debt was to July 2007,by this summer this years losses plus interest on £30 odd million will need to be added.
2)UBIG has "published" assets of £435m.What about the liabilities of £495 million.What was their profit? - NIL.
3)UBIG buy the site from Hearts? They don't own it.Its only leased from the Council!
Ewan, are you a reporter or just Mann's pet poodle?
23

GeorgeCowieOrWalterKidd?,

31/03/2008 15:46:54
#22 Sources please.

1) Yes, and huge transfer income will be added too, actually meaning this year could turn a profit on its own.
2) Source?
3) I understand Romanov bought the land for the new stand - the "site" mentioned. are you saying the council owns Tynecastle? Romanov owns it (unfortunately) and could sell to Cala if he wanted. The council put a clause in when he bought the extra land that it must be used for football purposes.
24

Glorious Hearts,

01/04/2008 09:25:11
#22 to quote #23, sources please, especially for point number 2.
I don't expect a reasonable reply....

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Would the new Hearts stadium plan lead to overcrowding problems?
Yes, emergency vehicles would struggle to get in.
Yes, but these could be fixed by banning cars on match days.
No, there’s still plenty of space left for more fans.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.