Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 30th November 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Food costs 'to soar' after pesticide ban



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 August 2008
CASH-strapped consumers face yet more soaring food prices because of plans by Brussels to ban commonly-used pesticides.
Farmers' leaders in Scotland predict rises of up to 50% on some staple items such as cereals, potatoes and fruit at a time when food price inflation is already at its highest for almost 30 years.

The EU says it wants to ban a range of up to 50 che
micals for use on crops because of their potential hazard to human health. They contain ingredients, which have, in high doses, been linked to cancer and other conditions.

But farmers say the products have been used safely for decades with no evidence of harm to humans. Banning them would lead to a dramatic reduction in crop yields and a consequent increase in food prices.

Crops would be replaced with more expensive imports with economists forecasting a 50% rise in the cost of grain, leading to a 15% increase in the price of bread, 19% for milk, cheese and eggs, and a 16% increase in meat if the proposals go ahead.

The National Farmers' Union in Scotland and England is now lobbying members of the European Parliament to prevent the ban coming into place.

The NFU is being backed by the UK Government. The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Hilary Benn, stressed his concern that "no proper assessment has been done on the impact of the cut-off proposals on agricultural production."

Consumer groups said they were worried about any measures that would add to the burden of hard-pressed buyers. A spokesperson for the Scottish Consumer Council said: "The SCC would obviously be concerned at anything that would cause food prices to continue to rise, given the pressure that this is already bringing to bear on families across Scotland, particularly those on lower incomes."

The proposals were agreed in June by a majority of EU farm ministers who want to see European food production move away from the use of pesticides to more "organic" production methods.

A second reading of the legislation – prior to it being incorporated into European law – is due this autumn.

The move will lead to at least 15% of pesticides used by UK farmers being phased out or banned across the Continent and could see crop yields of potatoes and other vegetables slump by as much as 60%.

Jim McLaren, president of NFU Scotland, said the EU had not recognised the impact of the proposals on consumers when household budgets were already being squeezed severely.

"These products underwent extensive testing before they were allowed to be used initially. There is no evidence they are injurious to human health," he said. "Many are pesticides vital to the continued production of food crops in Scotland, the UK and most of northern Europe. The risk for food supply, food security and food pricing is that if we lose these products then there is nothing there to replace them in the short term.

" The ability of Scottish farmers to produce these crops will be severely undermined."

A "conservative estimate" was that cereal yields could drop by 20%, which would equate to an annual loss of 60 million tonnes across the EU.

McLaren added: "When we lost a similar tonnage recently in the maize market in the US, prices went up by 60%. We can assume that there would be a similar price increase if EU cereal yields fall by 20%."

The Government's Home Grown Cereals Authority (HGCA) said the EU had not clearly defined the risks of the products under threat or assessed the economic impact of a ban on farmers and consumers.

Graham Jellis, the HGCA director of research, said: "If these substances were banned and yields dropped, we have to find somewhere to import the deficit from. That's okay in a good year, but in a bad year there is nowhere to go. If you reduce grain supply, the price will go up."

The European Commission says the fears that the plans will affect food production and costs are "unjustified".

A spokesman said: "The commission proposal would affect only a few substances, which are the most problematic ones for human health and the environment."

He added that the industry would have time to adapt as most affected chemicals would not be withdrawn for several years.

If crop yields are affected by the legislation, it would be further bad news for consumers, with food inflation surging to a record 9.5% this year. The price of fresh produce alone rose 10.8% in July – the worst rate since 1980 – according to the British Retail Consortium.

Farmers' leaders also argue that reducing the number of chemicals will remove important weapons in the armoury against crop pests.

McLaren said: "Farmers use different products every year to ensure that resistance doesn't build up. Reducing our armoury could be catastrophic, and we are working hard to make sure that European politicians understand the severity of what is being proposed."





The full article contains 835 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 August 2008 7:23 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 17/08/2008 02:17:00

"Baaaaa", said the Sheep, yes that's you me and even our Boy Wonder!

Because you know something,?

NO! ?

Well let me tell you!

You WILL Pay the extra, I WILL Pay the extra, Boy Wonder WILL Pay the extra!

And we WILL all Say "Baaaaa", and wont and cant do anything about it!

"Baaaaa", "Baaaaa", "Baaaaa", "Baaaaa", "Baaaaa"!

The time has come to, 'Stand up and be Counted' and to make, 'Such a Fuss' one wont think we have endless,..

'Purse-strings'!
2

somerferg,

perth 17/08/2008 04:54:50

Yet another scare story - oh we must accept pesticide/herbicide/genetically modified food or we will all starve to death because we can't afford to eat. Well first of all just about all of us needs to eat considerably less food to counteract the growing obesity problem. Secomnly this is being driven by money hungry corporations such as the big supermarkets trying desperately to keep increasing their market share/share price. Thirdly, farmers are not getting the benefits of our increasing cost to buy their produce. Its time to stand up against this scaremongering.
3

Boy Wonder,

17/08/2008 07:36:39
Comments by #1 shows an old man's wooly thinking.

You can make savings by growing what you can, baking your own bread and rolls, and becoming self-sufficient in evey way available. You don't have to be Tom and Barbara from "The Good Life" ... but the pointers are there!

Go green.
4

Unimpressed one,

17/08/2008 09:08:58
Another example of eco-madness causing suffering for ordinary people. Yet the same idiots ban GM crops which could potentially create pesticide-free plants. Typical greenatic double standards. What will the EU do when the rest of the world either refuses to reduce pesticide use or else develops pesticide resistant GM crops? Ban their import?
5

yockel,

17/08/2008 09:09:45
Sometimes get the impression the EU is out to destroy Europe by banning everything and anything that might make us competitive. The sources of these creazy ideas should be looked at more closely along with the funding sources of those who promote them.
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 17/08/2008 10:54:25

yockel ~5,

Yes you are correct! one reason they banned,..

'Haggis flavoured Crisps'

But then, it is only Scotland afterall! :(
7

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 17/08/2008 11:12:54
Jim McLaren "These products underwent extensive testing before they were allowed to be used initially. There is no evidence they are injurious to human health,"

'Boll@cks' - the pesticide testing regime in the UK is a complete joke. There is NO independent testing of pesticides; the pesticide industry is allowed to conduct its own trials and merely hands over the 'data' the the pesticides safety directorate.

The history of pesticides-useage in the UK since WWII is an unmitigated disaster. Thousands of farm-workers were killed by cancers caused by DDT, lindane, dieldrin, organophosphates etc. etc. and millions of ordinary consumers contracted cancers and other diseases as a result of ingesting pesticides.

As for GM foods enabling us to have pesticide-free crops - that is a laugh. The most common GM innovation is to create BT )bacillus thuringiensis) toxins INSIDE the crops, IN the food - which poisons any insect that feeds on the crop. It also poisons YOU!! All of the evidence from around the world is that GM crops lead to a massive increase in pesticide useage; the crops are engineered to RESIST the herbicides and pesticides applied to the field - so you can literally drench the crop in pesticides and only the weeds etc are killed. You then eat the grain that contains insect-poisons on the INSIDE and which has been drenched with herbicides and fungicides on the OUTSIDE. Double whammy.

8

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 17/08/2008 11:46:04
I agree with Boy Wonder.

Grow your own and if you don't have a backyard or garden to establish a place to grow vegetable and herbs, get an allotment.

This weekend's Financial Times says that allotments are the latest "trend" and teach children to be self-sufficient and grow healthier and pesticide-free and organic produce.

Try it. You will like it and enjoy the benefits. There is even a waiting list for allotments in some areas and many people consider being at the top of the list for assignment to a plot a real coup.

And to think that not too many years allotments were considered slightly "low-class", a hobby for pensioners to keep them same, and a way to clean up some pretty dire areas in UK cities.
9

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 17/08/2008 12:01:47
Why not do what our competitors do elsewhere in the EU? Just ignore the rules and get on with it...
10

Dougie - Edinburgh,

Edinburgh 17/08/2008 12:08:49
As a result, Europe will increase its food imports from foreign countries where exactly the same pesticides are used.
11

bumpkin,

17/08/2008 13:01:34
food imports will increase from the third world, causing hunger there.
Brasil will cut more rain forest and use more slave labour.
The imported food will contain more pesticides than home grown.
Once the famine sets in, perhaps uk farmers will be appreciated , and properly rewarded for their long hours and commitment to a job that frequently pays less than the minimum wage.
(How would joe blogs like to work 80 hrs a week for minus £500? )
12

yoric,

17/08/2008 14:57:13
Pull out of the EU, job done, simple, let Britain control its own regulations.
13

hertscot,

18/08/2008 09:48:50
So, we can't control the worlds population using contraception, because of right wing religious nuts and their followers.

We'll just starve them to death after their born.

We should be looking at maximising yeilds to feed the people of this country, we should be reducing imports, we should be securing our own supplies. I'm with DfB, support Scottish Farmers and help them feed Scotland.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.