Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 30th November 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Home Reports 'will ruin market'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 July 2008
CONTROVERSIAL new Home Reports which will add hundreds of pounds to the cost of selling homes in Scotland should be postponed until the current turmoil in the housing market subsides, according to property experts.
The three-tier reports – including a seller's survey, an energy performance report and a property questionnaire – are being introduced as a legal requirement by the Scottish Government in all house sales from December 1.

But hundreds of property
agents in Scotland are now calling for the launch of the reports, which will cost sellers £600 on average, to be abandoned until the housing market shows signs of recovery.

Agents predict that although house values in Scotland are currently stable, they could fall later this year, as they have in England, because of the general squeeze on mortgage lending caused by the credit crunch.

They argue that the speed of transactions has already slowed and the planned introduction of Home Reports will lead to even longer delays and fewer homes being put on the market.

The Glasgow Solicitors Property Centre, which represents more than 300 member firms in the west of Scotland, has written to Communities Minister Stuart Maxwell, saying: "The unprecedented change in the property market over recent weeks makes this a particularly bad time to launch such a fundamental change in the way residential property is bought and sold in Scotland.

"Given the recent turmoil in the financial markets and the reduction in funds available for mortgage lending, it will come as no surprise to you that selling residential property has become increasingly difficult."

The GSPC adds that the recent slowdown in the market

means a significant number of homeowners could be left with a substantial bill for a Home Report without ever selling their home, while the number of homes coming onto the market could fall significantly.

The Highland Solicitors Property Centre, which represents property agents in the north of Scotland, said it supported a postponement.

Spokeswoman Sarah Woodcock said: "December is traditionally a quiet time of year in the housing market and I would hate people not to put their property on because they say they can't afford to because of the Home Report."

Tayside Solicitors Property Centre said the housing market in its area was "flat" and the December launch date was the "wrong time".

"It couldn't be a worse time really," said spokeswoman Helen Wyllie. "Properties are taking longer to sell than they were a year ago and introduction of Home Reports at this time will only slow procedures further. We would prefer them to be held back until the market is more buoyant."

Home Reports were conceived by the former Labour-Lib Dem administration at Holyrood to end the problem of multiple surveys in a booming housing market, in which would-be buyers were each paying hundreds of pounds for home surveys on one property.

But although that problem was largely solved by the adoption of the "sale subject to survey" system, Home Reports survived the change to the SNP Government last year. With the addition of energy and property questionnaires, the package became the means to improving Scotland's housing stock and meeting new Brussels requirements on environmental standards.

Despite the endorsement of the Scottish Consumer Council, which believes they will raise housing standards, they have proved unpopular with homeowners. A voluntary pilot scheme launched in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Dundee and Inverness in July 2004 had to be scrapped after seven months, when only 74 sellers commissioned surveys compared with a planned 1,200.





The full article contains 588 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 July 2008 8:43 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

yockel,

06/07/2008 07:35:12
Add the problem of the private landlords wanting out because of the creeping backdoor nationalisation of the sector. Its a fine mess.

The government is taking positive action to devalue your home.

Why are the SNP pushing these damaging labour policies?
2

Unimpressed one,

06/07/2008 09:34:29
More eco-lunacy to go with their contribution to higher power costs and food.
3

Mikey,

06/07/2008 10:03:04
Maybe because some greedy people are buying houses as investments instead of homes?

Just a thought.

The average price of a HOME needs to go below 100K.

Just a thought!
4

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 06/07/2008 11:21:37
These Home Reports are ill-conceived and should be scrapped altogether. The multiple survey problem no longer exists as most offers are now subject to survey.
5

allknowing,

06/07/2008 12:25:39
"in which would-be buyers were each paying hundreds of pounds for home surveys on one property."

Why?/ When I bought my last two houses, it was subject to survey!! ONly half-witted morons spend hundreds of pounds on surveys!!


6

Rabster,

06/07/2008 15:24:39
No, only half witted morons support a system which requires people to offer sums of money for a house without having any idea whether it's worth that amount or not. This system will give people better information before making an offer and should help to avoid the massive price rises (and massive price falls) that we have recently as a result of the market getting carried away with itself. This is an excellent time for the change to happen, when there is a smaller volume of transactions going through the market anyway.
7

The Rattler,

Peebles 06/07/2008 15:39:54
Sorry Rabster, but the system to date policed itself fairly well. The 'Subject to Survey' clause still allows for people to adjust their offer should the valuation come in well below the offer. "The purchaser is the sole judge of whether or not a valuation is acceptable".

Please point out where there have been these massive price falls you quote - remember, this is Scotland.
8

JoeMcT,

BlairsFantasyIsland 06/07/2008 17:23:01
# 1 "Why are the SNP pushing these damaging labour policies?"

This is another EU policy being imposed on Britain.

Blame Brown, and others before him, for surrendering Sovereignty to Brussels.
9

bus user,

edinburgh 06/07/2008 23:38:38
Anyone who thinks these reports will have any effect other than to cost the seller more money is deluded.
Location sells houses more than any other factor and no-one will buy or not buy on the strength of a report unless two exactly similar houses next door to each other have different reports. More well intentioned nonsense from people who should, by now, know better.
10

Fraz 0810,

Dunfermline 07/07/2008 15:02:43
Home Reports have been widly derided within the housebuilding, surveying and legal sector as a total red-herring.
#6 Rabster, I would ask how willing you would be to accept a survey from a third party? Given the current climate, houses might be on the market for months - how long would you consider a survey to be valid? What about warranties to third parties?
The whole thing is a solution to a non-issue. As "the rattler" has pointed out, the system is perfectly able to police itself with the offer being "subject to survey".

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.