Green policy
Professor Charlie Jeffrey, senior vice-principal, rightly noted that the decision allows the university to leverage its investments “to bring about change” – not fall prey to an activist movement more concerned with media headlines than finding solutions to a climate problem.
Further proving its close consideration of this issue, the university will only divest if a company is “not investing in technologies that help address the effects of carbon emissions and climate change.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThis statement acknowledges the reality that there are plenty of energy-producing and consuming companies with the means to address climate challenges while meeting public demand. Why alienate ourselves as a research institution when we can instead become part of that change?
The UK needs excited engineers to fill the positions of today – many with energy and industrial companies – so that they can take part in developing the technologies of tomorrow.
Universities have the responsibility to encourage the workforce we desperately need, and rejecting divestment as a viable agent of change is one step in leading the effort.
Liam O’Keefe
North Berwick