Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 30th November 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

No Cold War but it's getting very chilly



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 August 2008
Russia's power is much weaker than it likes to believe
'THE jealous and intolerant eye of the Kremlin can distinguish, in the end, only vassals and enemies; and the neighbours of Russia, if they do not wish to be one, must reconcile themselves to being the other". So wrote George Kennan, a senior America
n diplomat, in 1944.

The Georgians would be the first to confirm that not very much has changed in the past 60 years. They have had no intention of becoming a vassal; they are now an enemy.

In the last week we have seen Vladimir Putin's determination to exert dominance over Russia's 'near abroad'. In doing so Moscow has acted in a hypocritical manner. It is not that long ago since Russia suppressed, in the most brutal manner, separatist feeling in Chechnya. They did so claiming that they needed to preserve Russia's territorial integrity. Now they are attempting to destroy Georgia's by supporting secession in South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Moreover, even if one acknowledges the ham-fisted way in which Georgia attempted to reclaim control of its breakaway provinces, it is clear that Russia's use of force was well planned. The troop movements it initiated were complex, and the swiftness with which it made grossly exaggerated claims of 'genocide' was breathtaking. This demonstrates a degree of premeditation that undermines any claim that Russia was forced to act on the grounds of humanitarian expediency.

President Mikheil Saakashvili, below, of Georgia has protested that the Russians would not have dared to attack his country if Nato, at its summit in Bucharest in April, had been willing to accept Georgia as a member. But the Russians are not naïve nor simple. What would Nato be doing that it is not doing, if Georgia was a member?

It is inconceivable that American, British and French troops would today be flying into Tbilisi to begin a war against the Russians and force the South Ossetians, against their will, back into Georgia. The First World War began with the murder of an Archduke in Sarajevo. The Third World War will not begin in South Ossetia.

But for the Russians the real target is not Georgia. It is Ukraine and, in particular, Crimea. Ukraine, which is a major European country, was ruled by Moscow for hundreds of years. The Kremlin cannot bear to see it as an independent, democratic state drawing closer to the West. It finds it intolerable that the Crimea, with a Russian-speaking population and the Russian Navy's largest base at Sevastopol, should not be part of Russia.

The United States and Western Europe must be tough with Russia over Georgia not just because of the aggression there but, even more importantly, because the Russians must not be tempted to try and dismember Ukraine. If that happened the whole balance of power in Europe since the end of the Cold War would be fragmented with highly-dangerous consequences.

The tense status quo is unlikely to evolve into a new Cold War. Russia does not have the military or economic strength to play the role of world superpower once more.

However, by attacking Georgia the Kremlin has ruined its chances of securing entry into the World Trade Organisation, and placed Russian membership of the G8 group of industrialised countries in deep jeopardy.

Russia's power is much weaker than it likes to believe.

Its oil and gas reserves are massive but if it refused to sell its gas to Europe it would be unable to sell it elsewhere because the pipelines do not exist. It would lose more than half of its own revenues and be in economic crisis.

The US and the EU must be both tough and realistic. They must not make threats they cannot enforce. Nato membership is largely irrelevant as there is no question of the US going to war with Russia over Georgia or Ukraine. But Russia can be punished, economically, politically and diplomatically for its aggressive behaviour.

It won't be a new Cold War. But there will be climate change. And it will get very chilly for some time to come.

Sir Malcolm Rifkind MP was foreign secretary and secretary of state for defence between 1992-97





The full article contains 709 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 August 2008 1:03 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Ivona Vujica,

Ottawa Canada 17/08/2008 02:24:34

STOP RUSSIA GAZPROM RABASKA LNG FACILITY IN CANADA

August 13, 2008

This document given to global politicians,energy stakeholders, investment banks and houses etc.

http://floodiceorfire.wordpress.com/stop-russia-gazprom-rabaska-lng-faci...

There has been grievous outsized naked aggression and intimidation of the former Soviet republic and free, Democratically elected Republic of Georgia. President Dmitry Medvedev has unofficially called off all hostilities.

1) We demand the permanent full cessations of hostilities in The Georgian region.

2) We demand the unpartisan protection, safety and welfare of all civilians

3a) We demand that Canada immediately halts Rabaska Gazprom Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) facility in Quebec

3b) This facility effectively establishes a Russian Energy Beachhead in North America and in a time of crisis would endanger Central Canada and help destabilize North America.

A full LNG tanker from Russia, if it should "accidentally" explode, has been proven to have an impact of 55 Hiroshima Nuclear Bombs. The Rabaska LNG facility itself located just across from Quebec City, opposed by local citizens, would itself have the effect of heavier impact nuclear bombs.

http://timrileylaw.com/LNG_TANKERS.htm

Enbridge Inc. and their partners Gaz Metro and Gaz de France announced last month(June 2008) that the company has signed a Letter of Intent with Gazprom Marketing & Trading USA, Inc., which outlines the terms under which Gazprom will become an equity partner in the proposed Rabaska liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification project.

Under the agreement Gazprom has agreed to supply 500 million cubic feet per day to the $840-million terminal east of Quebec City.

The Rabaska terminal is expected to introduce a new source of natural gas supply to the Quebec and eastern Ontario markets.

"The Rabaska LNG project will deliver the critical infrastructure needed to bring an important new source of natural gas supply to Ont
2

Ivona Vujica,

Ottawa Canada 17/08/2008 02:25:47

STOP RUSSIA GAZPROM RABASKA LNG FACILITY IN CANADA

critical infrastructure needed to bring an important new source of natural gas supply to Ontario and Quebec," said Stephen J.J. Letwin, executive vice president, gas transportation and international for Enbridge.

"This new supply will benefit the two provinces' growing number of natural gas consumers, many of whom are customers of Enbridge Gas Distribution, as well as support Ontario's increasing emphasis on natural gas to fuel environmentally responsible power generation. Gazprom's involvement in the Rabaska LNG project gives strong momentum to advancing this project and meeting those needs."

Using the Rabaska terminal, Gazprom, which is a subsidiary of OAO Gazprom, expects to import Russian LNG supplied from the Shtokman liquefaction project.

The Shtokman gas and condensate field, discovered in 1988, is located in the central part of the Barents Sea, about 450 kilometers northeast of the city of Murmansk, Russia.

http://www.journalofcommerce.com/article/id28110

Mr. Medvedev, born in 1965, is a lawyer and former law professor who worked in politics and business in St. Petersburg after the collapse of the Soviet Union, bringing him into close contact with Mr. Putin and the other reformers in that city's government. He followed Mr. Putin to Moscow in 1999 and, despite his relative youth, rose influence and prominence. In 2000, Mr. Medvedev became chairman of Gazprom, the energy giant, which has increasingly become a wealthy corporation and instrument of Kremlin foreign and domestic policy.

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/dmitri_a_me...

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin flew from Beijing just north of South Ossetia to meet with Russian generals – like Julius Caesar at the Rubicon – (CAESER NON SUPRA LOGOS GRAMMATICOS) – yet the Russian Constitution states that President Dmitry Medvedev is Commander in Chief.

To be fair, the Republican Bush-McCain administration ha
3

Ivona Vujica,

Ottawa Canada 17/08/2008 02:27:11

STOP RUSSIA GAZPROM RABASKA LNG FACILITY IN CANADA


To be fair, the Republican Bush-McCain administration has been stoking and provoking this crisis by insisting on Georgia's inclusion in the Cold War NATO alliance, even against the advice of its European allies.

Senator John McCain's top foreign policy advisor Randall Scheunemann, as pointed out by Governor Bill Richardson (New Mexico) has professionally lobbied for Georgia's inclusion into NATO. Senator McCain himself as chairman of the International Republican Institute has long sought for inclusion of Georgia into NATO.

The Republican Bush-McCain administration has also long sought and are imminently attempting to implement "Missile Shield" in former Eastern Bloc countries notably Poland and Czech Republic - Remember the Cuban 1962 October Missile Crisis? No Redux.

Sen. John McCain has been accused by Judicial-Watch of Accepting improper Donations from
Lord Jacob Rothschild.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2008/apr/judicial-watch-calls-fec-inv...

Lord Jacob Rothschild is heavily involved with Russian Oil Giant Yukos and Oligarch Mikhail
Khodorkovsky-the article(Washington Times and BBC) states Khodorkovsky gave Lord Rothschild all his controlling shares.

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2003/nov/02/20031102-111400-3720r/

Senator McCain in a well known statement has said when he looked into Vladimir's
Putin's eyes all he saw was 3 letters K,G and B., fair enough, but we suggest when we look
into Sen. John McCain's eyes we see 3 letters, M.I.A..

America and the World we ask you can you Trust John McCain with his finger on the
Nuclear button?

The Georgians and other Eastern Europeans and indeed the World with friends like the Republican Bush-McCain administration who are the representative of King Coal, Big Oil and Gas, Nuclear power and Weapons, who needs enemies like Putin, who also represents King Coal, Big Oil and Gas, Nuclear power and Weapons? The world needs to know th
4

Ivona Vujica,

17/08/2008 02:27:49

STOP RUSSIA GAZPROM RABASKA LNG FACILITY IN CANADA


The Georgians and other Eastern Europeans and indeed the World with friends like the Republican Bush-McCain administration who are the representative of King Coal, Big Oil and Gas, Nuclear power and Weapons, who needs enemies like Putin, who also represents King Coal, Big Oil and Gas, Nuclear power and Weapons? The world needs to know that America and Europe stand for something more. The solution is before our Eyes - Humanity is at grave risk. We must turn to a 100% Renewable Energy World immediately

Where were you when they crucified Georgia?
By George Pitcher the Telegraph UK

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/08/12/do...

(Article asking about the whereabouts of Western leaders and World Religious leaders)

Bush Administration Launches "Sneak Attack" On Endangered Species Act

Suemedha Sood 08/12/2008 the Washington Independent

Abolition King Coal, Fossil fuels, Nuclear power and Weapons

Contact Coordinator Ivona Vujica psea4earth@gmail.com
Paradigm Shift Environmental Alliance

www.floodiceorfire.wordpress.com
5

Richardinho,

17/08/2008 09:59:17
I find it interesting that Rifkind says 'Russia does not have the military or economic strength to play the role of world superpower once more. '

Surely he realises that things can change and that economic 'strength' can rise. Don't be surprised if Russia follows the example of China and becomes an economic powerhouse in the next ten or twenty years.

Any analysis of the political/military situation in the region must take into account that possibility.
6

Neil,

Glasgow 17/08/2008 14:10:12
The reason that people voted for Putin is that Russian GNP doubled in his 2 terms as President. I suspect Gordo would be extremely popular if he had done the same.
7

Itchy,

17/08/2008 14:24:02
#5 and #6 Russia would have done considerably better if it had more freedom.
8

Neil,

Glasgow 17/08/2008 16:03:05
Itchy I would actually tend to agree with you on that. I believe the statistical evidence is indeed unmistakable that economic freedom correlates closely with growth.

This is why I support going for the most cost efective way of producing power, cutting corporation tax, letting people who want to invest £1 billion here do so, letting housebuilders build houses & all the other numerous ways our government impoverishes us.

The corolary of your point & the fact that their economy is growing 3 times faster than ours is that Russia already has much more economic freedom than us.
9

SouthernGent,

17/08/2008 21:06:28
If Russia continues on its current path, then it is likely that its economy will suffer when its current trading partners decide to do business elsewhere. China did not get where it is today with out opening up its trade with the west. The US is its biggest buyer, and for the moment, they need each other to continue. Those that say China can pull the rug out from under the US are fooling themselves, as China knows they would be cutting off the hand that feeeds them.
10

Neil,

Glasgow 18/08/2008 13:04:18
Your 2nd point is correct & is why China has no intention of cutting itself off from the US or any other market.

It conflicts with your first point in that our economy would suffer if we cut ourselves off from Russia who, in your phrase, are the "hand that feed" Europe's energy. Russia has built most of its pipelines to Europe but it does also have an eastern border connecting it to the fast frowing economies of China & South Korea & also Japan.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.