Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 17th August 2008 Change Date

Free Map of Scottish Castles

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Island strife breaks out as Skye's clear blue water and rugged mountain landscape is scarred by a council CCTV camera



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 July 2008
IT IS one of the quietest corners of one of Scotland's most beautiful islands.
Crime is almost unknown in the village of Elgol on south-west Skye where most residents enjoy a lifestyle free of many of the other downsides of mainland, urban communities. Livings are made from the tourists who visit for the magnificent views of th
e Cuillins mountain range and the boat trips to view the abundant marine life.

But the peace has been shattered by the intrusion of sinister, 21st-century technology into the heart of the remote community.

Highland Council installed a £1,200 CCTV system last month on the village pier, along with prominent warning notices, after arguments among local boat owners about berthing rights.

Residents have now raised a petition for its removal, claiming the camera system invades their privacy, overlooks the village beach where children play and creates the perception among tourists that Elgol is a crime blackspot.

Most of the residents in the 100-strong village have now signed the petition to be presented to councillors later this year.

Among the organisers is Melanie McKinnon, who said the villagers objected to their children being constantly caught on camera.

"The beach is right next to the pier and it's the only beach in Elgol so children go to play there after they've been at school," she said. "Why should they be under 24-hour surveillance?"

It also gave the wrong impression to visitors, she added. "On the first day the camera went up 10 people went into the shop to ask about crime levels in Elgol.

"It's embarrassing. People are asking whether it's safe to leave their cars. There hasn't been crime here in the 10 years I have lived here."

The concerns were echoed by Hermione Lamond, who runs the shop. "We may be naive living here but CCTV cameras have an association with crime," she said. "You can appreciate how small we are and how remote we are and the quiet way of living we have here.

"There is no need for a CCTV camera whatsoever and it is a slight on our community which we don't like.

"The council says it was installed for harbour management purposes, that there were boats using the pier that should not have been. Yet we live here all the time and don't see them.

"The council also says the camera is trained on the pier and nowhere else but if that's the case it must have tunnel vision."

Former community councillor Christopher McKinnon said: "We never needed a CCTV camera in Elgol before and we don't need one now.

"We depend on tourism here and we don't need technology that suggests there is a problem here that requires constant surveillance. We don't want it and we want rid of it."

The camera was installed after a dispute between the boatmen who compete to take tourists on trips to view the imposing mountain chain, smaller islands and wildlife including whales, dolphins, basking sharks and golden eagles.

An insider, who did not wish to be named, said: "They were competing for business and certain boats were only allowed in at certain times. But there was a bit of sneaking in to pinch customers. There were complaints and I think the council put the camera in to try to put a stop to it."

The council says it has no intention of removing the camera. Neil Gillies, director of technical services, said there had been "some issues" last year involving various users of the jetty and the council had decided to set up the CCTV to try and improve the management of the facility.

"The CCTV is fixed and concentrates on the jetty and immediate area," he said. "No one is monitoring the CCTV. It is on a permanent recording system and would only be checked if the council had been notified of any incidents. No incidents have been reported since it was installed."

He added that the council was aware of a petition being organised, but to date it had not been received.

But the John Muir Trust, the conservation charity which owns the Strathaird crofting estate surrounding Elgol, said it fully supported the community's desire to have the camera removed.

Andrew Campbell, head of land management, said: "The pier is one of the most picturesque spots in Skye, with a world famous view of the Cullin mountains. As passionate defenders of wild land we are totally opposed to the intrusion of CCTV cameras and signs into one of the most remote parts of Scotland.

"It gives the impression to visitors that Elgol is some kind of high crime blackspot and nothing could be further from the truth. There was little consultation about putting the camera there and we fully support the efforts to get it removed."





The full article contains 821 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 July 2008 8:36 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Matt there,

somewhere 06/07/2008 00:35:23
"No one is monitoring the CCTV."

Then why install it? There's something fishy about this...
2

An Beal Bacht,

Her Majesty's Prison UK 06/07/2008 02:52:00
Soon there will be nowhere left where we aren't monitored. Protest and survive.
3

Fanling,

Switzerland 06/07/2008 03:30:46
The chief success of CCTV in Scotland (and worse in England) seems to be its ability to generate hours of TV cop car-chase programmes, weekend raving drunks (lots of lassies) and the like. It is insidious and largely useless in crime prevention. It is next to worthless in bringing about a convincing string of convictions. It is a show rather than a positive law-enforcement procedure.

Footage is invariably rustled up long after the event, for the benefit of voyeurs and bored police. Kick cooncil erses, Elgol people.
4

terry osser,

morden 06/07/2008 05:53:15
put a tyre around it you know the rest. direct action is necessary because democracy has been killed by bliar and nulab
5

Guga II,

Rockall 06/07/2008 06:00:34
Nothing that a can of paint wouldn't fix.
6

yockel,

06/07/2008 06:41:18
The council is the new Stasi, and they love it. Time to push back.
7

P I Staker,

06/07/2008 09:09:12
Hmmm, don't suppose it'll be too long before it 'falls off' into the water.
8

Thomas Aikenhead,

Edinburgh 06/07/2008 09:20:43
MONEY and CONTROL are the two drivers behind the CCTV sphere of activity in the UK.
CCTV is an industry that markets itself very aggressively in order to generate profits, and does so under the watchword SECURITY. The industry has seen extraordinary expansion in the UK by lobbying both the private and public sector.

But take a second to think about the use of CCTV. Like fingerprinting, DNA and identity documents, it has a significant and valid role to play in our society, but each carries a financial and social cost. Their use must be agreed, defined and accepted by the general public as well as their elected representatives AND the state.

The use of CCTV in this case is to resolve potential issues about boat priority. Is this an appropriate use of CCTV? The essential element is the absolute absence of consultation BEFORE the deployment of the CCTV camera. Even when questions have been raised, rather allowing a discussion the council stated



9

WKKB,

06/07/2008 09:32:34
Although I'm opposed to CCTV cameras being set up on every corner I certainly wouldn't be against one being watchfull over an area where children play so long as it's watched/manned by someone of integrity. If something happened to my child or someone elses, especially on a beach, I'd sure want to know what, when, and how and a CCTV camera would have a greater chance of telling me that than not having one. So, I certainly wouldn't use my children as an argument NOT to have one.
Melanie McKinnon says
"The beach is right next to the pier and it's the only beach in Elgol so children go to play there after they've been at school," she said. "Why should they be under 24-hour surveillance?"
Does that mean her children are on the beach 24/7? Shame of her. But going further, as a parent I sometimes wish I could have 24/7 protection for my little ones.
10

Glasgow Jim,

Glasgow 06/07/2008 10:18:07
Isn't it sad when cousins fall out?
11

Upbeat,

06/07/2008 10:25:56
A better place to evaluate the rustproofing and waterproofing of any electrical gadget would be hard to find.

What will be interetsing to know is how much money the Council feels it is justified in spending on maintenance of this gadget ,annually, simply to be in a position to confirm the details of any possible complaint they may receive.

In the old days a man's word was his bond. I am sure that this still applies in small communities on Skye. The Truth of any "incident" at the pier will be local gossip and public knowledge long before the salt spray from storms is cleared from the optics by routine maintenance crews...at huge cost to ratepayers
12

Chris,

Edinburgh 06/07/2008 10:33:10
There was a dispute between local boatmen and the council reacted to a complaint from, presumably, a village taxpayer. They were doing their job. What do you expect them to do - employ pier-watchers 24/7? It sounds as though life in the village is not so idyllic after all. I doubt very much if this all resulted from one complaint. The council surely has investigated, been met with non-cooperation and eventually decided that the camera was the best option. The signs are required by law, so they had no choice there.
13

Pilrig.,

Livingston 06/07/2008 13:27:40
9 - how do you going about finding out that the cctv is being monitored by a 'person of integrity' ?
14

skye appreciation,

Glasgow 06/07/2008 13:32:28
Would the money spent by Highland Council on such a "blot on the landscape" in this beautiful area, not be better used for tourist facilities on the island...e.g. vantage point telescopes or instructions in common sense berthing by local boat owners!!!
15

Upbeat,

06/07/2008 13:41:06
No Chris, I beg to differ.

This appears to be nothing more than a Big town knee jerk solution to a small community problem. It is an example of the misuse of powers accidentally extended to councils by lax legislation. Similar to monitoring car parking remotely and fining people who pause on double yellow lines, it is blatant abuse of power....power incidentallu which should reside with the Northen constabulary , not the council officials.

It may be acceptable in a large community -where there are many people - to spy on them in this way. But on Skye it is an unnecessarily draconian abuse of council powers in this instance.

The costs to the greater community of providing and maintaining this piece of equipment quite overshadow the possible benefits that it will deliver.

If you understand where Ergol is located, and the nature of the traffic that comes and goes from this pier you will see: 1) How exposed the location is. 2) How few people live there. 3) How few tourist boats use this pier. 4) Exactly who the probable culprits might be.

It does not take a hammer to crack a small nut. And the chances are that any CCTV camera will not be working well enough for long enough in this exposed location ...to spot what has occured anyway... are huge. Finally should a late night dispute arise in partial view of the camera, I don't give much to the chances of any 'spy' camera surviving for long after the event.
16

victormeldrew,

condorrat 06/07/2008 13:46:04
I notice the 'local resident spokesperson' says ''in the ten years I've lived here''.
Why is it that every time I hear comments from ''local residents'' in highlands and islands,they are comparative newcomers, and invariably have English accents. Are the local Scots complacent, or just so easy-going they need others to speak for them?
17

,

06/07/2008 14:49:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

yoric,

06/07/2008 17:13:00
"Blot on the landscape"?
Plans are afoot to cover the Scottish Highlands in 100 foot high Windturbines, 100s of them,on the tops of the highest hills where they can be seen for miles, and this little camera is a "blot on the landscape"?
19

john z,

edinburgh 06/07/2008 17:28:02
My god, who are the complete morons who decided to do this?? Their pictures should be posted around Skye in order to shame them.

If I lived there I'd take it down myself. Who do these eejits in the council think they are??

Take it down. Don't ask. Take it down, and send it to the eejit responsible in the council in bits.
20

john z,

edinburgh 06/07/2008 17:29:32
It'd be a terrble shame if an 'accident' were to befall the camera.
21

john z,

edinburgh 06/07/2008 17:30:53
WKKB,

You are SOOOOOOOO naive, it beggars belief.
22

Scot Patriat,

Bandon 06/07/2008 19:02:47
Maybe it is time to remind the council members that they are public servants and the will of the majority should prevail.

Is somebody getting a hand out?

Maybe the council needs to be fired!
23

Chris,

Edinburgh 06/07/2008 20:12:27
#15, Upbeat: OK, I accept your argument.
24

GlenB,

06/07/2008 22:59:14
#18

Alas Yoric if only the wind turbines of which you speak were a mere 100 feet.

These monstrosities will be of 100 meters plus some 400 feet I have heard tell.
25

SouthernSkye,

13/07/2008 09:10:58
The £1,200 could have been better spent elsewhere on the island. Pure and simple waste of money.


16 victormeldrew.
You seem fixated with non-local. But what do you deem to be a non-local?
Our neighbours moved from Staffin to Harrapool and have been here for some time. Were they to be questioned by the media they would also be able to respond with "In the 10 years we have lived here...."
My neighbours son is soon to marry. When he does so either he will move to Tarskavaig or his wife will move to Harrapool.Either way one of them will be able to state "In the short time I have lived here...".
So, try not to always jump to conclusions.
26

Destroy the Planet,

13/07/2008 10:10:15
What if somebodys offloading drugs ? Or a small child goes missing ? You wont be smilling will you when theres no evidence ? Eh ? If youve got nothing to hide, nothing to fear, blah blah.
This is your controller speaking, you will obey.

Seriously though, a cameras a bit much to settle pier rights abuses. I thought a letter to all concerned would be the obvious method, or just go round and chap there door.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.